janegoodall.org 的前十大競爭對手

rootsandshoots.org

I was able to help, and I knew I was able to help.

defenders.org

Our Strategy

gorillafund.org

Conservation doesn’t happen in isolation, it takes us all to save gorillas. Whether an individual or a corporation, we can all do our part.

worldwildlife.org

Read the latest conservation stories and updates from WWF about wildlife, people, and the planet.

fauna-flora.org

Fauna & Flora is a conservation charity. Our purpose is to protect the diversity of life on Earth, for the survival of the planet and its people. We work closely with local conservation partners in over 40 countries to save nature, together.

climaterealityproject.org

Climate Reality Terms of Use

4apes.com

find out about the great apes - our relatives - and how you can help to save them from extinction.

nature.org

From our historic work in land acquisition to cutting-edge research that influences global policy, TNC is constantly adapting to take on our planet’s most important challenges. Our vision is a world where the diversity of life thrives, and people act to conserve nature for its own sake and ours.

envirolink.org

The next time you’re on a flight worrying about destroying the planet, rest easy knowing that at least you’re not in a fighter jet. The airline industry is responsible for 2.5 percent of global CO2 emissions, but the world’s militaries are responsible for more than double that, at 5.5 percent. When nations boost military budgets, they also boost their carbon emissions. With a bump of $157 billion, thanks to the budget the Trump administration passed earlier this month, the United States now spends $1 trillion each year on defense. That’s more than three times as much as China, the next highest spender, as well as the entire European Union. If combined, the world’s armed forces would have the fourth highest carbon footprint, behind India, the U.S., and China. Yet it’s been maddeningly difficult for researchers to monitor the emissions of militaries, which aren’t required to report these things. “There’s a guessing game involved,” said Nick Buxton, who has coauthored reports on military emissions from the Transnational Institute, an international research and advocacy group. “One of the overwhelming calls for everyone working in the sector is just for more open and transparent data, so we can come up with some reliable figures.” To that end, using what data the Department of Energy has made publicly available between 1975 to 2022, researchers have calculated that if the U.S. consistently decreased military spending — by even a little — instead of increasing it, it’d be saving as much energy as Delaware and Slovenia use in a year. A decrease of less than 7 percent each year over about a decade would theoretically reduce energy consumption from about 640 trillion to 394 trillion British thermal units (a measurement of heat energy produced from burning fuels). The study gives observers not just a better idea

greenpeace.org

Together we can change the world