10 principais micheladrien.blogspot.com concorrentes

slaw.ca

After ten hours of flying, an eight-hour layover, a seven-hour timezone change, and one missed flight, I finally made it to my second Legal Design Summit in Helsinki. In 2023, I reluctantly left Helsinki after buzzing with excitement about the like-minded community I had just met and the interesting work being done across the globe […]

thecourt.ca

Start your future with confidence. Pursue your passion and prepare to meet the moment.

conniecrosby.blogspot.com

Blog by Canadian Law Librarian / Info Diva / Consultant

michaelgeist.ca

The government quietly released a “what we heard” report this week discussing the response to its 30-day sprint AI consultation from last October. Described as the “largest public consultation in the history of ISED”, the report relies heavily on AI for its analysis as the government notes that it used “Cohere Command A, OpenAI GPT-5 nano, Anthropic Claude Haiku and Google Gemini Flash to read through the submissions and identify common themes.” Given that it received 64,600 responses to 26 questions, it says AI enabled it to shrink a process that would typically take many months into a matter of weeks. In addition to the public consultation survey, AI Minister Evan Solomon formed a 28 person expert committee that provided the government with 32 different papers and reports. Those documents were similarly subject to AI analysis with the “what we heard" report devoting several pages to the expert analysis and recommendations. Yet unlike the public survey responses, the government has posted all the experts' reports, which allows the public to see the actual advice alongside the government’s summary of it. Since the government used AI to summarize the expert reports, I thought I would do the same.