Top 10 divisionsbc.ca Competitors

uptodate.com

Wolters Kluwer is a global provider of professional information, software solutions, and services.

pathwaysmedicalcare.ca

find a family doctor. search for md, clinic or nurse practitioner. find care today or register for a family physician or nurse practitioner. covid 19 testing & vaccine information

healthlinkbc.ca

medically-approved information on over 5,000 health topics, symptoms, medical tests, medications, and tips for healthy eating and lifestyle choices.

doctorsofbc.ca

Doctors of BC is a voluntary association of 14,000 physicians, residents and medical students in British Columbia.

health-local.com

HealthLocal offers two online marketing services to help Canadian Health Professionals reach customers in their local communities.Simple Website Service (SWS): Avoid expensive and complex web projects. We will create, host and support your website so you can focus on your business.Simple SEO Service (SSS): We develop effective keyword-rich content to amplify your online footprint so local customers will find you.Join over 100,000 Canadian Health Professionals already on Health Local.

jabfm.org

Background: In 2020, the state of California started financially incentivizing primary care practices to screen for adverse childhood events (ACEs). In its current Medicaid 1115 waiver, the state also has encouraged health care teams to screen for social risks (SR) − (eg, food, housing, and transportation insecurity). In this qualitative study, we explore community health center (CHC) staff and patient perspectives about opportunities and barriers to integrating adult screening for ACEs and SR. Methods: We identified eligible California CHCs through Medicaid claims data on ACEs screening and/or participation in ACEs or SR-related learning collaboratives. Staff and/or patients in 12 clinics participated in semistructured interviews exploring opportunities and barriers to integrated ACEs and SR screening. Interviews were analyzed using a rapid qualitative data analysis approach. Results: Thirty-nine clinic staff (including clinic leaders, allied health professionals, licensed clinicians) and 10 patients participated. While staff and patients often conceptually endorsed integrated ACEs and SR screening, they identified substantial practical barriers to integration. Barriers primarily related to different screening frequencies and workflows. Other barriers reflected broader primary care time constraints and workforce shortages. Participants shared multiple recommendations to improve screening programs, including strategies for combining ACEs and SR screening. Discussion: California CHC staff and patients described several conceptual benefits of integrating ACEs and SR screening, but longstanding primary care challenges make it complicated to integrate these activities. Standardizing the integration of ACEs and SR screening will require institutional and structural shifts to overcome common barriers to providing whole person care.