lindseymackereth.substack.com 的前十大競爭對手

radiohealthjournal.org

Frequently asked questions about Radio Health Journal, including ways to listen, how to get contact us, affiliate and syndication info.

tendingpaths.wordpress.com

I updated this again last February, and shared it on Instagram, but forgot to share it here! Edited 9/6/24: The venn diagram is available to download as a free PDF here:

helloalma.com

Considering starting a private practice? Get expert advice from a therapist who knows how it's done.

eggshelltherapy.com

Narcissistic parents abuse their child in invisible ways. It can include projection, gaslighting, mind games, the passive-aggressiveness.

drjasonfung.medium.com

Read writing from Dr. Jason Fung on Medium. Nephrologist. New York Times best selling author. Interest in type 2 diabetes reversal and intermittent fasting. Founder www.TheFastingMethod.com.

brainflow.co

Explore the pivotal role of magnesium in enhancing physical and mental health, as recommended by experts like Andrew Huberman.

thehealthyconsultant.com

Passionate about real food, easy recipes, and helping others live a healthier and happier lifestyle. Mostly Paleo, Whole30, Keto, and dairy-free.

10almonds.com

A free daily newsletter that keeps you in the know on all things health and productivity.

mh.bmj.com

Medical Humanities publishes original interdisciplinary studies on the history of medicine, cultures of medicine, disability, gender, bioethics & medical education.

mentalhealth.bmj.com

Background To drive improvement in clinical services, an important innovation will be to regularly assess patients’ psychotic experiences in order to guide, monitor and, when needed, alter treatment provision. The great heterogeneity in presentations of psychosis means that a comprehensive assessment battery is impractical. A plausible solution is computerised adaptive testing (CAT), which uses real-time computation to present the most informative questions to an individual. Fewer questions are needed to reach similar precision as a full questionnaire.Objective We tested the potential of a CAT for paranoia to halve the number of items that need to be presented.Methods We used the established item response theory psychometric properties of the 10-item Revised Green et al Paranoid Thoughts Scale (Persecution) to run CAT simulations in four datasets in which participants had completed the full scale: a representative survey of 10 382 UK adults; a clinical trial with 319 patients with psychosis; a cohort study of 836 National Health Service (NHS) male patients with psychosis; and a clinical trial with 89 patients with persecutory delusions. The CAT algorithm used the graded response model and the test was concluded when the SE of estimation dropped below 0.3 or five items had been answered.Findings On average, the CAT administered 4.2, 4.0, 4.2 and 4.0 items to each person in the four datasets. The correlations between the CAT score and the full-scale paranoia score were 0.95, 0.94, 0.94 and 0.87. Minimal systematic error in paranoia estimation occurred (mean bias scores=−0.01, –0.06, −0.07 to –0.10). Estimation was the least precise for people at the boundary of normal and elevated levels of paranoia.Conclusions In datasets with people across the whole paranoia continuum, accurate estimates of paranoia can be provided by a CAT with fewer than half the items of the full scale. Tailored testing may work well with people with psychosis.Clinical implications CAT may be a w