10 principais discovery.ucl.ac.uk concorrentes

researchgate.net

Access 160+ million publication pages and connect with 25+ million researchers. Join for free and gain visibility by uploading your research.

scholar.google.com

google scholar provides a simple way to broadly search for scholarly literature. search across a wide variety of disciplines and sources: articles, theses, books, abstracts and court opinions.

sciencedirect.com

sciencedirect is the world's leading source for scientific, technical, and medical research. explore journals, books and articles.

link.springer.com

providing access to millions of research articles and chapters from science, technology and medicine, and humanities and social sciences

tandfonline.com

search and explore the millions of quality, peer-reviewed journal articles published under the taylor & francis and routledge imprints.

jstor.org

jstor is a digital library of academic journals, books, and primary sources.

onlinelibrary.wiley.com

one of the largest and most authoritative collections of online journals, books, and research resources, covering life, health, social, and physical sciences.

mdpi.com

MDPI is a publisher of peer-reviewed, open access journals since its establishment in 1996.

academic.oup.com

Oxford Academic

arxiv.org

A system of non-tradable credits that flow between individuals like karma, hence proposed under that name, is a mechanism for repeated resource allocation that comes with attractive efficiency and fairness properties, in theory. In this study, we test karma in an online experiment in which human subjects repeatedly compete for a resource with time-varying and stochastic individual preferences or urgency to acquire the resource. We confirm that karma has significant and sustained welfare benefits even in a population with no prior training. We identify mechanism usage in contexts with sporadic high urgency, more so than with frequent moderate urgency, and implemented as a simple (binary) karma bidding scheme as particularly effective for welfare improvements: relatively larger aggregate efficiency gains are realized that are (almost) Pareto superior. These findings provide guidance for further testing and for future implementation plans of such mechanisms in the real world.