May 2026
Create an account to continue using Similarweb
View website metrics, keywords, top marketing channels, market research tools, and more.
Create your free accountmttlr.org
Global Rank
#4,608,509
346,876Showing Similarweb estimated data.
Publicly validate your site’s metrics by connecting your GA4
Reflect your success
Verify your website's traffic and engagement metrics by connecting to Google Analytics
Bounce Rate
42.25%
Pages per Visit
2.00
Avg Visit Duration
00:00:42
- Company
- - -
- Industry
- - -
Top 10 mttlr.org Competitors
The Top 10 Sites Like mttlr.org in May 2026 are ranked by their affinity to mttlr.org in terms of keyword traffic, audience targeting, and market overlap
At the turn of the twentieth century, state courts were roiled by claims against telegraph corporations for mental anguish resulting from the failure to deliver telegrams involving the death or injury of a family member. Although these “telegraph cases” at first may seem a bizarre outlier, they in fact reveal an important and understudied moment of transformation in the nature of the relationship between the corporation and the public: the role of affective relations in the development of the category of the public utility corporation. Even as powerful corporations were recast as private, rights-bearing, profit-making market actors in constitutional law, a significant minority of rural state courts deviated from the common law to impose liability for mental anguish on negligent telegraph corporations. They did so on the basis that telegraph companies bore a duty to protect the emotional wellbeing and family connections of their customers. In this, courts gave voice to the popular view, voiced by telegraph users and promoted by the companies themselves, of the telegraph corporation as a faithful servant of individual families and communities. In so doing, they embedded the historical and popular perception of the corporation as “servant” into the definition of “public service.” This Article exposes the private law of the public service corporation and the noneconomic dimension of the legal category of “public utility.” Current scholarship has focused on how turn-of-the-century jurists developed the category of “public utility” or “public service” corporation to justify state economic regulations that would otherwise infringe on corporations’ newfound constitutional rights. The telegraph cases reveal a concurrent and complementary development in tort law: the imposition of affective responsibilities on certain corporations as well. Illuminating this doctrine offers an example of how the public utility category could be mobilized to protect the emotional as well as eco
- Company
- - -
- Industry
- - -
Global Rank
#1,895,821
356,856Bounce Rate
61.45%
Pages per Visit
1.76
Avg Visit Duration
00:00:24
Similarity Score
100%- Company
- - -
- Industry
- - -
Global Rank
- -
Country Rank
- -
Category Rank
- -
Bounce Rate
64.77%
Pages per Visit
1.65
Avg Visit Duration
00:00:33
Similarity Score
100%Berkeley Law is one of the nation’s premier law schools, located at UC Berkeley. Offering JD, LLM, JSD and joint degrees, as well as individual courses.
- Company
- - -
- Industry
- - -
Global Rank
- -
Country Rank
- -
Category Rank
- -
Bounce Rate
74.19%
Pages per Visit
2.01
Avg Visit Duration
00:00:49
Similarity Score
99%Below are frequently asked questions relating to the Exchange program at Duke Law. For information about Duke's LLM program, please see the LLM website.
- Company
- - -
- Industry
- - -
Global Rank
- -
Country Rank
- -
Category Rank
- -
Bounce Rate
47.1%
Pages per Visit
1.97
Avg Visit Duration
00:01:01
Similarity Score
94%Privacy Policy Privacy Policy At https://www.ejcl.org/ (the “Site”), we […]
- Company
- - -
- Industry
- - -
Global Rank
- -
Country Rank
- -
Category Rank
- -
Bounce Rate
- -
Pages per Visit
- -
Avg Visit Duration
- -
Similarity Score
82%Student Editorial Board, Federal Courts Law Review, 2017 – 2018 Editor-in-Chief James B. Kelly Executive Editor Kaylee Beauchamp Executive Articles Editors Mallory K. Bland Alison Guider J. Patrick Huston Catherine Norton Zachary B. Roberson TreMarcus Rosemon Executive Notes and Comments Editors Jonathan M. Barnes Amber L. Kipfmiller Davis S. Vaughn Associate Editors Brittany Bane Kyle …
- Company
- - -
- Industry
- - -
Global Rank
#6,247,661
623,473Bounce Rate
36.23%
Pages per Visit
1.87
Avg Visit Duration
00:00:39
Similarity Score
82%Understanding workers' compensation is crucial for workplace safety, ensuring financial assistance and medical care for injured employees while navigating legal and regional compliance complexities.
- Company
- - -
- Industry
- - -
Global Rank
- -
Country Rank
- -
Category Rank
- -
Bounce Rate
- -
Pages per Visit
- -
Avg Visit Duration
- -
Similarity Score
77%- Company
- - -
- Industry
- - -
Global Rank
- -
Country Rank
- -
Category Rank
- -
Bounce Rate
- -
Pages per Visit
- -
Avg Visit Duration
- -
Similarity Score
77%- Company
- - -
- Industry
- - -
Global Rank
- -
Country Rank
- -
Category Rank
- -
Bounce Rate
- -
Pages per Visit
- -
Avg Visit Duration
- -
Similarity Score
77%- Company
- - -
- Industry
- - -
Global Rank
- -
Country Rank
- -
Category Rank
- -
Bounce Rate
- -
Pages per Visit
- -
Avg Visit Duration
- -
Similarity Score
77%mttlr.org's top 5 competitors in May 2026 are: michiganlawreview.org, law.richmond.edu, law.berkeley.edu, law.duke.edu, and more.
According to Similarweb data of monthly visits, mttlr.org’s top competitor in May 2026 is michiganlawreview.org. mttlr.org 2nd most similar site is law.richmond.edu, and closing off the top 3 is law.berkeley.edu.
law.duke.edu ranks as the 4th most similar website to mttlr.org and ejcl.org ranks fifth in May 2026.
The other five competitors in the top 10 list are fclr.org, albanylawjournal.org, cjlt.dal.ca, ijlit.oxfordjournals.org, and jltp.uiuc.edu.