August 2026
Create an account to continue using Similarweb
View website metrics, keywords, top marketing channels, market research tools, and more.
Create your free accountnewacademic.net
Global Rank
#494,940
96,392Country Rank
#22,974
2,444Showing Similarweb estimated data.
Publicly validate your site’s metrics by connecting your GA4
Reflect your success
Verify your website's traffic and engagement metrics by connecting to Google Analytics
Bounce Rate
35.84%
Pages per Visit
4.04
Avg Visit Duration
00:03:55
- Company
- - -
- Industry
- - -
Top 10 newacademic.net Competitors
The Top 10 Sites Like newacademic.net in August 2026 are ranked by their affinity to newacademic.net in terms of keyword traffic, audience targeting, and market overlap
letpub sci论文英语润色和同行资深专家修改团队全部由以英语为母语,有长期编辑科技论文经验的编辑组成。他们来自于临床医学、生物、化学、物理、工程学 、天文学、地球与环境科学、人文社会学、商学等不同学科领域,且有丰富的sci研究论文、领域综述的发表经验,经常获邀担任一些期刊的审稿人。
- Company
- LetPub
- Industry
- Science and Education > Biology
Bounce Rate
40.66%
Pages per Visit
3.17
Avg Visit Duration
00:03:10
Similarity Score
100%- Company
- CNKI
Bounce Rate
21.92%
Pages per Visit
7.17
Avg Visit Duration
00:07:05
Similarity Score
78%we provide the latest sci-hub proxy mirror, you can directly download literature by searching for doi and url links
- Company
- - -
- Industry
- - -
Global Rank
#202,027
24,307Bounce Rate
46.73%
Pages per Visit
1.95
Avg Visit Duration
00:01:38
Similarity Score
68%MDPI is a publisher of peer-reviewed, open access journals since its establishment in 1996.
- Company
- MDPI
Global Rank
#3,250
29Bounce Rate
51.47%
Pages per Visit
2.71
Avg Visit Duration
00:03:14
Similarity Score
59%Access 160+ million publication pages and connect with 25+ million researchers. Join for free and gain visibility by uploading your research.
Global Rank
#441
2Bounce Rate
42.6%
Pages per Visit
3.86
Avg Visit Duration
00:03:12
Similarity Score
58%We perform a behavioral experiment of karma, a class of mechanisms for repeated resource allocation with attractive fairness and efficiency properties, in theory. Individuals in these mechanisms bid non-tradable credits that flow from resource consumers to yielders, like karma. Human subjects recruited on Amazon MTurk are repeatedly and randomly paired to bid karma according to time-varying and stochastic individual preferences or urgency to acquire resources. Treatments varied in the dynamic urgency process (frequent moderate urgency versus sporadic high urgency) and the richness of the bidding scheme (binary versus full range). Results are benchmarked against random allocation, and karma achieves a (almost) Pareto improvement over random, despite the MTurk subjects deviating significantly from the theoretically optimal Nash bidding policy. Maximum improvement is attained by subjects that deviate from Nash by up to one karma bid unit on average, and positive improvement is attained with average deviations of up to 3-4 bid units. These findings hold across all treatments, among which no significant differences are found, with the exception of the sporadic high urgency process with binary bidding treatment being (weakly) favorable over others. These results offer behaviorally robust lower bounds for the expected performance of karma in human populations. They also provide guidance for future testing and implementation of karma mechanisms in the real world.
- Company
- - -
- Industry
- - -
Global Rank
#2,255
77Bounce Rate
39.74%
Pages per Visit
3.15
Avg Visit Duration
00:04:10
Similarity Score
58%newacademic.net's top 5 competitors in August 2026 are: letpub.com.cn, cnki.net, sci-hub.ee, mdpi.com, and more.
According to Similarweb data of monthly visits, newacademic.net’s top competitor in August 2026 is letpub.com.cn. newacademic.net 2nd most similar site is cnki.net, and closing off the top 3 is sci-hub.ee.
mdpi.com ranks as the 4th most similar website to newacademic.net and researchgate.net ranks fifth in August 2026.
The other five competitors in the top 10 list are arxiv.org, , , , and .