Top 10 psicothema.com Competitors

redalyc.org

La producción científica de México en revistas iberoamericanas, Biología

revistadepsicologiayeducacion.es

revista iberoamericana de psicología y salud

psycnet.apa.org

apa psycnet home page

dialnet.unirioja.es

Perfil de Autor en Dialnet.

infocop.es

CONSEJO GENERAL DE LA PSICOLOGÍA DE ESPAÑA Nuestro sitio web usa cookies propias. Las cookies son pequeños ficheros que se instalan en el disco duro o en el navegador y ayudan a personalizar los servicios, facilitar la navegación y obtener información de los visitantes de la web. En concreto, usamos las siguientes cookies: La presente […]

ioppublishing.org

Expanding the world of physics IOP Publishing is a society-owned scientific publisher, providing impact, recognition and value for the scientific community. As the publishing arm of the Institute of Physics, 100% of our profit goes towards public and scientific good. Our publications Discover our diverse product portfolio of over 100 open access and hybrid journals, many […]

jabfm.org

Background: In 2020, the state of California started financially incentivizing primary care practices to screen for adverse childhood events (ACEs). In its current Medicaid 1115 waiver, the state also has encouraged health care teams to screen for social risks (SR) − (eg, food, housing, and transportation insecurity). In this qualitative study, we explore community health center (CHC) staff and patient perspectives about opportunities and barriers to integrating adult screening for ACEs and SR. Methods: We identified eligible California CHCs through Medicaid claims data on ACEs screening and/or participation in ACEs or SR-related learning collaboratives. Staff and/or patients in 12 clinics participated in semistructured interviews exploring opportunities and barriers to integrated ACEs and SR screening. Interviews were analyzed using a rapid qualitative data analysis approach. Results: Thirty-nine clinic staff (including clinic leaders, allied health professionals, licensed clinicians) and 10 patients participated. While staff and patients often conceptually endorsed integrated ACEs and SR screening, they identified substantial practical barriers to integration. Barriers primarily related to different screening frequencies and workflows. Other barriers reflected broader primary care time constraints and workforce shortages. Participants shared multiple recommendations to improve screening programs, including strategies for combining ACEs and SR screening. Discussion: California CHC staff and patients described several conceptual benefits of integrating ACEs and SR screening, but longstanding primary care challenges make it complicated to integrate these activities. Standardizing the integration of ACEs and SR screening will require institutional and structural shifts to overcome common barriers to providing whole person care.