kenkyu-web.tuat.ac.jp 的前十大競爭對手

tuat-global.jp

学長ビジョンに提唱される「国際連携に基づく新機軸の創生と世界レベルの研究力強化」に向けて、GIRでは海外からの外部資金獲得・海外企業との共同研究奨励のため、本学内教員を対象として、海外より獲得した外部...

researchmap.jp

researchmapご利用者のみなさま 国立情報学研究所からの依頼で、「『オープンサイエンスの状況等に関するアンケート調査』へのご協力のお願い」をご案内します。アンケートに...

tuatdaizukan.net

農工大 先生大図鑑

vtti.vt.edu

the virginia tech transportation institute (vtti) is continually advancing transportation through innovation and has affected public policy on national and international levels. vtti has effected significant change in public policies for driver, passenger, and pedestrian safety and is advancing the design of vehicles and infrastructure to increase safety and reduce environmental impacts.

sustainability.uwo.ca

Western University is one of Canada’s top research-intensive universities, ranking #1 in Canada and #3 in the world for sustainable development according to the 2022 Times Higher Education Impact Rankings. Challenging the best and brightest faculty, staff and students to commit to the highest global standards, Western’s research excellence expands knowledge and drives discovery with real-world application.

wzl.rwth-aachen.de

rwth aachen university - laboratory for machine tools and production engineering (wzl) of rwth aachen university - homepage

nipunbatra.github.io

Probabilistic ML course 2022

michiganlawreview.org

Do employers have constitutional rights of expressive association? Two decades ago, in Boy Scouts of America v. Dale, the Supreme Court held that a state law prohibiting discrimination based on sexual orientation could not be applied to a membership organization that wished to exclude a gay leader. Today, courts face a rising tide of claims from employers, who argue that Dale constitutionally insulates their hiring and firing decisions from antidiscrimination law. A narrow majority of courts have denied such claims, holding that Dale does not apply at work. Increasingly, however, courts are siding with these employers, eliding any distinction between membership organizations and workplaces. Across the board, courts have failed to provide a coherent justification for their decisions. This Article makes the case that membership and employment diverge along both expressive and associational dimensions. Employment comes apart from membership in its distribution of material resources, reliance on coercive authority, and integration of a diverse polity. We trace these distinctions through work law and uncover their presence within First Amendment doctrine, sometimes openly stated, but often more subtly invoked. Put together, they support a presumption against extending the right of expressive association to the relationship between an employer and its employees.