八月 2026
engineering.msu.edu
全球排名
- -
国家/地区排名
- -
品类排名
- -
显示 Similarweb 估计数据。
关联 GA4,公开验证您的网站指标
与您的成功同步
绑定 Google Analytics,验证您网站的流量及用户参与度指标
跳出率
47.68%
每次访问页数
2.69
平均访问时长
00:02:20
- 公司
- - -
- 行业
- - -
engineering.msu.edu的 10 大竞争对手
在 八月 2026 与 engineering.msu.edu 相似的前 10 名网站,按关键字流量、受众定位和市场重叠方面与 engineering.msu.edu 的关联性排名
13 top-ranked departments within a top public research institution.
- 公司
- - -
- 行业
- - -
全球排名
- -
国家/地区排名
- -
品类排名
- -
跳出率
50.88%
每次访问页数
3.01
平均访问时长
00:02:29
Access 160+ million publication pages and connect with 25+ million researchers. Join for free and gain visibility by uploading your research.
跳出率
42.6%
每次访问页数
3.86
平均访问时长
00:03:12
We perform a behavioral experiment of karma, a class of mechanisms for repeated resource allocation with attractive fairness and efficiency properties, in theory. Individuals in these mechanisms bid non-tradable credits that flow from resource consumers to yielders, like karma. Human subjects recruited on Amazon MTurk are repeatedly and randomly paired to bid karma according to time-varying and stochastic individual preferences or urgency to acquire resources. Treatments varied in the dynamic urgency process (frequent moderate urgency versus sporadic high urgency) and the richness of the bidding scheme (binary versus full range). Results are benchmarked against random allocation, and karma achieves a (almost) Pareto improvement over random, despite the MTurk subjects deviating significantly from the theoretically optimal Nash bidding policy. Maximum improvement is attained by subjects that deviate from Nash by up to one karma bid unit on average, and positive improvement is attained with average deviations of up to 3-4 bid units. These findings hold across all treatments, among which no significant differences are found, with the exception of the sporadic high urgency process with binary bidding treatment being (weakly) favorable over others. These results offer behaviorally robust lower bounds for the expected performance of karma in human populations. They also provide guidance for future testing and implementation of karma mechanisms in the real world.
- 公司
- - -
- 行业
- - -
跳出率
39.74%
每次访问页数
3.15
平均访问时长
00:04:10
相似度评分
93%- 公司
- - -
- 行业
- - -
全球排名
- -
国家/地区排名
- -
品类排名
- -
跳出率
11.62%
每次访问页数
3.02
平均访问时长
00:00:01
ECE Design Winners: Senior Design & Intro to ECE Design II
- 公司
- - -
- 行业
- - -
全球排名
- -
国家/地区排名
- -
品类排名
- -
跳出率
50.73%
每次访问页数
2.73
平均访问时长
00:01:55
Enjoy our free webinars and learn how you can make the most of your Overleaf account. Whether you are a researcher, teacher, student or professional, we’ve got a webinar for you.
跳出率
32.88%
每次访问页数
3.66
平均访问时长
00:04:02
Join the world's most widely adopted, AI-powered developer platform where millions of developers, businesses, and the largest open source community build software that advances humanity.
跳出率
36.66%
每次访问页数
5.77
平均访问时长
00:06:24
相似度评分
86%Viterbi Summer Undergraduate Research Experience (SURE) HomeResearch OpportunitiesSURE FellowsFAQsThank you for your interest in the USC Viterbi SURE Program. Please note that the Summer 2026 SURE Program has been paused and will not be offered during the upcoming summer cycle. At this time, there is no confirmed timeline for when the program will resume. Any future updates will be posted ... Read More
- 公司
- - -
- 行业
- - -
全球排名
- -
国家/地区排名
- -
品类排名
- -
跳出率
71.53%
每次访问页数
1.43
平均访问时长
00:01:00
The Georgia Institute of Technology, also known as Georgia Tech, is a top-ranked public college and one of the leading research universities in the USA. Georgia Tech provides a technologically focused education to more than 25,000 undergraduate and graduate students in fields ranging from engineering, computing, and sciences, to business, design, and liberal arts. Georgia Tech's wide variety of technologically-focused majors and minors consistently earn strong national rankings.
- 公司
- - -
- 行业
- - -
全球排名
- -
国家/地区排名
- -
品类排名
- -
跳出率
56.67%
每次访问页数
2.21
平均访问时长
00:03:00
- 公司
- - -
- 行业
- - -
全球排名
- -
国家/地区排名
- -
品类排名
- -
跳出率
61.01%
每次访问页数
2.29
平均访问时长
00:01:01
engineering.msu.edu在 八月 2026 的前五名竞争对手是:engin.umich.edu、researchgate.net、arxiv.org、coe.montana.edu等。
根据 Similarweb 的月访问量数据,engineering.msu.edu 在 八月 2026 的头号竞争对手是 engin.umich.edu。与 engineering.msu.edu 相似度排名第二的网站是 researchgate.net,排名第三的是 arxiv.org。
在 八月 2026,coe.montana.edu 被评为与 engineering.msu.edu 相似度第四高的网站,ece.msstate.edu 位居第五。
进入前十名榜单的其他五家竞争对手分别是 overleaf.com、github.com、viterbi.usc.edu、ae.gatech.edu 和 engineering.uci.edu。
