sama.live的 10 大竞争对手

mysama.ca

Base solution for your next web application

strategicclaims.net

Please note that Court has rescheduled the Fairness Hearing to May 5, 2026, at 3:00 p.m. at the Louisville courthouse.

siac.org.sg

where the world rbitrates learn more condolences siac extends deepest condolences on passing of siac board member mr rajiv luthra the board of directors, court of arbitration, and management of the singapore international arbitration centre (siac) are deeply saddened to learn of the passing of mr rajiv luthra, a member of the siac board of […]

milberg.com

The Milberg law firm is a leader in class action and mass tort cases, setting groundbreaking legal precedents and recovered over $50 billion.

lieffcabraser.com

"2024 Class Action Litigation Department of the Year" - New York Law Journal Lieff Cabraser is committed to achieving justice for our litigation clients through class actions and individual lawsuits. Since 1972, we have helped recover over $129 billion in verdicts and settlements for our clients worldwide.

joinclassactions.com

If you received a housing stipend while working for HealthTrust, you may have had it unfairly reduced or withheld—and could be eligible for compensation.

consumervoice.uk

Bringing you the latest news on collective action, group legal claims and your right to compensation. Sign up to stay updated.

colevannote.com

Got notice of a data breach? Sign up here with our Retention Agreement to act now.

singletonschreiber.com

If you or a loved one has been injured in an e-bike accident, call the experienced San Diego e-bike accident lawyers at Singleton Schreiber today.

papajohnsemployeesettlement.com

This lawsuit is entitled In Re Papa John’s Employee and Franchise Employee Antitrust Litigation, Case No. 3:18-CV-00825-BJB-RSE (W.D. Ky.), and is pending in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Kentucky. In this lawsuit (referred to herein as the “Class Action Litigation”), Plaintiff Ashley Page (the “Named Plaintiff”) on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, alleges that Defendants Papa John’s International, Inc. and Papa John’s USA, Inc. (collectively, “Defendants”) violated Section 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1. More specifically, the Named Plaintiff alleges that Defendants entered into agreements with their franchisees pursuant to which franchisees agreed not to hire or solicit employees of Defendants or of other franchisees, which in turn depressed the wages and diminished the employment opportunities of restaurant-level employees at Papa John’s branded restaurants. After extensive negotiations, the Parties reached an agreement to settle the Class Action Litigation subject to the Court’s preliminary and final approval of the settlement. This settlement (the “Settlement”) represents a compromise and settlement of highly disputed claims in the Class Action Litigation. Defendants deny all the claims asserted in the Class Action Litigation, deny any and all liability or wrongdoing of any kind associated with any of the facts or claims alleged in the Class Action Litigation, and make no concessions or admissions of wrongdoing or liability of any kind whatsoever. Nothing in the Settlement is intended or will be construed as an admission by Defendants that the Named Plaintiff’s claims or any of the class claims alleged in the Class Action Litigation have merit or that they have any liability to the Class Members on those claims. The Parties disagree as to the probable outcome of the Class Action Litigation with respect to liability and damages if it were not settled.  Nevertheless, the Named Plaintiff, on behalf of hersel