Mai 2026
Erstellen Sie ein Konto, um Similarweb weiterhin zu nutzen
Lassen sie sich Website-Metriken, Keywords, Top-Marketing-Kanäle, Marktforschungs-Tools und mehr anzeigen.
Erstellen Sie Ihr kostenloses Kontoqmenta.com
Globaler Rang
#2,971,250
1,163,356Geschätzte Daten von Similarweb anzeigen.
Überprüfen Sie die Metriken Ihrer Website öffentlich, indem Sie Ihr GA4 verbinden
Reflektieren Sie Ihren Erfolg
Überprüfen Sie die Traffic- und Engagement-Metriken Ihrer Website durch Verbinden mit Google Analytics
Absprungrate
38.82%
Verweildauer
2.67
Durchschnittliche Besuchsdauer
00:03:01
- Unternehmen
- - -
- Branche
- - -
Top 10 qmenta.com Wettbewerber
Die Top-10-Websites wie qmenta.com in Mai 2026 sind in absteigender Reihenfolge nach ihrer Affinität zu qmenta.com in Bezug auf den jeweiligen Schlüsselwörter-Traffic, das Zielgruppen-Targeting und entsprechende Marktüberschneidungen aufgeführt
Realize immediate value with subscription-based Advanced Visualization & Artificial Intelligence across your entire organization
- Unternehmen
- TeraRecon
Globaler Rang
#3,548,666
436,596Absprungrate
35.89%
Verweildauer
2.76
Durchschnittliche Besuchsdauer
00:02:42
Similarity-Score
100%The tweets show a side of the pandemic that statistics and charts could never capture.
Globaler Rang
#793,884
77,349Absprungrate
42.95%
Verweildauer
2.73
Durchschnittliche Besuchsdauer
00:00:38
Similarity-Score
92%Explore open access research in political science, analyzing governance, representation, policy, power dynamics and global politics.
- Unternehmen
- Frontiers
Globaler Rang
#5,770
800Absprungrate
61.47%
Verweildauer
2.31
Durchschnittliche Besuchsdauer
00:02:21
Similarity-Score
89%Byung Hun studies how how neurons communicate and visualizes their activities in the brain.
- Unternehmen
- - -
- Branche
- - -
Globaler Rang
- -
Länderranking
- -
Kategorischer Rang
- -
Absprungrate
75.22%
Verweildauer
1.37
Durchschnittliche Besuchsdauer
00:00:19
Similarity-Score
87%ISMRM Privacy Policy Last Updated 23 May 2018 Personal Information Collection and Use We collect the minimal amount of personal information necessary for us to provide services and continually design
- Unternehmen
- - -
- Branche
- - -
Globaler Rang
#68,130
125,875Absprungrate
32.91%
Verweildauer
8.48
Durchschnittliche Besuchsdauer
00:07:54
Similarity-Score
85%CSHL is a research and educational institution. The Laboratory has research programs focusing on cancer, neurobiology and plant genetics and a broad educational mission, including the recently established Watson School of Biological Sciences. We invite you to explore our Website.
- Unternehmen
- CSHL School of Biological Sciences
Globaler Rang
- -
Länderranking
- -
Kategorischer Rang
- -
Absprungrate
43.99%
Verweildauer
2.98
Durchschnittliche Besuchsdauer
00:01:16
Similarity-Score
82%BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: ASPECTS quantifies early ischemic changes in anterior circulation stroke on NCCT but has interrater variability. We examined the agreement of conventional and automated ASPECTS and studied the value of computer-aided detection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively collected imaging data from consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke with large-vessel occlusion undergoing thrombectomy. Five raters scored conventional ASPECTS on baseline NCCTs, which were also processed by RAPID software. Conventional and automated ASPECTS were compared with a consensus criterion standard. We determined the agreement over the full ASPECTS range as well as dichotomized, reflecting thrombectomy eligibility according to the guidelines (ASPECTS 0–5 versus 6–10). Raters subsequently scored ASPECTS on the same NCCTs with assistance of the automated ASPECTS outputs, and agreement was obtained. RESULTS: For the total of 175 cases, agreement among raters individually and the criterion standard varied from fair to good (weighted κ = between 0.38 and 0.76) and was moderate (weighted κ = 0.59) for the automated ASPECTS. The agreement of all raters individually versus the criterion standard improved with software assistance, as did the interrater agreement (overall Fleiss κ = 0.15–0.23; P < .001 and .39 to .55; P = .01 for the dichotomized ASPECTS). CONCLUSIONS: Automated ASPECTS had agreement with the criterion standard similar to that of conventional ASPECTS. However, including automated ASPECTS during the evaluation of NCCT in acute stroke improved the agreement with the criterion standard and improved interrater agreement, which could, therefore, result in more uniform scoring in clinical practice. CAD : computer-aided detection and diagnosis
- Unternehmen
- - -
- Branche
- - -
Globaler Rang
#199,095
43,299Absprungrate
46.75%
Verweildauer
2.07
Durchschnittliche Besuchsdauer
00:01:00
Similarity-Score
80%ASNR Diversity and Inclusion Resources This is a curated list of resources on various Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) topics. This list will be continually updated with new resources as they become available. If you have resources you would like to see added to this list, please contact us. ASNR…
- Unternehmen
- - -
- Branche
- - -
Globaler Rang
#626,475
46,441Absprungrate
58.49%
Verweildauer
1.72
Durchschnittliche Besuchsdauer
00:00:41
Similarity-Score
79%- Unternehmen
- - -
- Branche
- - -
Globaler Rang
- -
Länderranking
- -
Kategorischer Rang
- -
Absprungrate
59.15%
Verweildauer
1.80
Durchschnittliche Besuchsdauer
00:00:49
Similarity-Score
76%We exist to beat cancer. And we're dedicated to saving and improving lives with our research. Will you help us transform the lives of future generations?
- Unternehmen
- Cancer Research UK
Globaler Rang
#21,874
325Absprungrate
61.38%
Verweildauer
2.47
Durchschnittliche Besuchsdauer
00:01:24
Similarity-Score
75%qmenta.comDie Top-5-Wettbewerber in Mai 2026 lauten: terarecon.com, martinos.org, frontiersin.org, brain.harvard.edu und mehr.
Laut Similarweb-Daten zu monatlichen Besuchen ist terarecon.com in Mai 2026 der Top-Wettbewerber von qmenta.com. Die zweitähnlichste Website ist martinos.org, gefolgt von frontiersin.org auf Platz 3.
brain.harvard.edu ist die viertähnlichste Website zu qmenta.com, während ismrm.org in Mai 2026 den fünften Platz belegt.
Die weiteren fünf Wettbewerber in der Top-10-Liste sind cshl.edu, ajnr.org, asnr.org, hst.mit.edu und cancerresearchuk.org.