Los 10 principales competidores de antitraffickingreview.org

migrantjustice.org

OUR IMPACT

aseanact.org

The non-punishment principle sets out that victims of trafficking should not be prosecuted or otherwise punished for unlawful acts they commit as a consequence of trafficking. It does not offer blanket immunity, but is a critical tool for victim protection and human rights-based criminal justice response to human trafficking. The ASEAN Convention Against Trafficking In...

enactafrica.org

ENACT Africa organisation which enhances human security by providing authoritative research, expert policy advice and capacity building.

adcmemorial.org

Russia promises hospitality to FIFA world cup guests – but not everybody is welcome in this country today. Would you like to walk in the centre of Moscow or go sight-seeing in St. Petersburg? On 5 May 2018 more than 1,500 persons (700 of them in Moscow, more than 200 in St. Petersburg) were

ijb.utoronto.ca

Featured stories IJB Updates Innovate. Collaborate. Illuminate. The Investigative Journalism Bureau is an impact-driven, collaborative newsroom, bringing together professional and student journalists, academics, graduate students and media organizations to tell deeply-reported stories in the public interest. Help us reach our goal of $250,000 Over the past four years, we’ve fought countless battles for public records, […]

aidsunited.org

WASHINGTON D.C. – Today, U.S. Representatives Mark Pocan (WI-02) and Robin Kelly (IL-02), along with Senators Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) and Jeff Merkley (D-OR), led a bicameral letter with 97 of their colleagues to President Trump urging him […]

fullerproject.org

After court records burned and prosecutions stalled following Gen Z protests, survivors found their own ways of achieving justice

jesp.org

Are there functions that a state must do for itself instead of relying on others to perform on its behalf? Some argue that suppressing private violence and enforcing the law are powers that only the state may exercise, meaning the state is responsible not only for ensuring that they are discharged but for discharging them itself. In this article, I challenge the do-it-yourself principle that animates much of the recent philosophical literature on privatization. In its place, I defend a rights-based theory of delegated state power. A state’s consistent failure to adequately protect rights is a reason for the state to voluntarily delegate powers to a third party that is better placed to use them to protect rights. This account grounds the legitimacy of delegation on the protection of rights rather than on state consent. I illustrate the theory by showing how it could justify delegating policing and penal powers to charter cities, semiautonomous cities run by a guarantor country or private developer. I consider the conditions under which a charter city developer is likely to adequately safeguard the rights of its residents. Finally, I argue that neither sovereignty nor democratic legitimacy prohibits the state from delegating its coercive powers. When a state is incapable of protecting rights, delegation is not a betrayal of sovereignty and democracy but a step toward their realization.