journaljpri.com 的前十大競爭對手

ijpsr.com

international journal of pharmaceutical sciences and research (ijpsr) is an official publication of society of pharmaceutical sciences & research. it is an open access online and print international journal published monthly. website: www.ijpsr.com projected impact factor (2012): 2.44, icv 2012: 5.50, 2011: 5.07, 2010: 4.57 doi: 10.13040/ijpsr.0975-8232 sj impact factor (2012): 3.226 global impact factor (2013): 0.533, (2012): 0.452 indexing - embase- elsevier's

aaps.org

the site home page

pcne.org

The updated PCNE-DRP classification V9.1 and amended cases went into international validation round 2. 158 pharmacists from 12 countries completed the survey. The report of the second validation round can be found here and is publicly available. The executive summary is also available. These issues were discussed with pharmaceutical care experts during the online Working Conference 2021.

thepharmajournal.com

The Pharma Innovation, an pharmaceutical journal covers the field of Pharmaceutics, Pharmacognosy, Pharmaceutical chemistry, Phytochemistry, Pharmacology. This journal provides the research ground for the researchers and provides them proper support.

abccardiol.org

PREPRINTS O Preprint é um manuscrito científico completo que é depositado pelos autores em um servidor público. O Preprint contém dados e metodologias completos. Este é publicado na Web dentro de aproximadamente um dia, sem passar por avaliação pelos pares e pode ser visualizado gratuitamente por qualquer pessoa no mundo, em plataformas hoje desenvolvidas para este propósito, permitindo que os cientistas controlem diretamente a disseminação de seu trabalho na comunidade científica mundial. Na maioria dos casos, o mesmo trabalho publicado [...]

inquiriesjournal.com

In theories of political practice and institutional design, there is a clash between what should be done ideally, and what can be done realistically. Many philosophers and politicians offer unique takes on this dilemma of making human law and government...

indianpediatrics.net

indian pediatrics is the topmost ranking specialty journal of south east asia, the region which is currently the focus of attention for most child health programs in the world in view of its tremendous scope and potential in improving child survival. the journal emphasizes on adopting evidence based and unbiased approach towards common childhood problems.

ebm.bmj.com

Inconsistency is a key domain that determines the certainty of evidence. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach specifically defines inconsistency as the variability in results across studies, and not variability in study characteristics, eligibility criteria or design.1 Statistical measures of heterogeneity are often used to assess inconsistency, however, major limitations of such measures have been described. For example, Cochran’s Q test for homogeneity is usually underpowered to detect heterogeneity. The I2 index which is the most commonly used measure, underestimate true statistical heterogeneity when there are fewer than 10 studies in a meta-analysis, which is a common scenario, and is correlated with the sample size of the included studies.2 The I2 index is also often misunderstood as an indicator of the spread of the effect size. Borenstein demonstrates how a meta-analysis with I2 index of 25% can have more spread of the effect size than a meta-analysis with I2 index of 75%.3 Therefore, GRADE guidance on inconsistency recommended less reliance on statistical measures and instead, instructed to make judgements about whether studies in a meta-analysis provide estimates that are clinically importantly different from each other.1 However, there are no existing tools to facilitate this process making it highly subjective. Users are instructed to look at a forest plot and evaluate the similarity of point estimates of the included studies and the overlap of their CIs, and make a judgement based on values that they consider clinically important. Merely counting studies does not work because some studies can be outliers but may have a very small weight within the pooled effect estimate. Having multiple thresholds makes this task even more difficult. Furthermore, in the case of binary outcomes, decision thresholds are based on absolute treatment effects4 5 whereas …

macrothink.org

FAQ - Macrothink Institute