acepnow.com的 10 大竞争对手

acep.org

Get the answers to all of your questions about Scientific Assembly, including pre-conference and post-conference planning and activities.

journalfeed.org

Keep up with the current medical research in Emergency Medicine, Internal Medicine, Family Medicine, and Pediatrics in audio form!

onlinelibrary.wiley.com

one of the largest and most authoritative collections of online journals, books, and research resources, covering life, health, social, and physical sciences.

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Gates Foundation, St Jude Children's Research Hospital.

archivesofmedicalscience.com

Introduction: A considerable proportion of patients with systemic lupus ery­thematosus (SLE) have liver enzyme abnormalities. We evaluated whether fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) was associated with increased mortality of SLE patients. Material and methods: A multicenter retrospective cohort study was...

clinicalimagingscience.org

The Journal of Clinical Imaging Science (JCIS) is an open access peer-reviewed journal committed to publishing high-quality articles.

rsfjournal.org

There is a growing multidisciplinary effort to understand the political causes and consequences of the US deportation system amid rapidly changing policies and significant data limitations. I contribute to this timely work by considering how interactions between an increasingly empowered executive branch and a politically polarized Congress shape deportation policymaking. I apply a policy feedback approach, a theoretical lens that analyzes policies and polities as co-constitutive, and construct a novel dataset to computationally analyze how Congressmembers publicly responded on Twitter to the Trump administration’s implementation and suspension of the family separation policy in 2018, during which migrant parents were prosecuted and detained separately from their children. Findings suggest that Republican and Democratic Congressmembers are unlikely to respond to executive assertions of power on deportation, even when policies are highly unpopular among the public. This raises concerns about shared governance on deportation policy and its implications for migration and democracy.