五月 2026
researchid.com
显示 Similarweb 估计数据。
关联 GA4,公开验证您的网站指标
与您的成功同步
绑定 Google Analytics,验证您网站的流量及用户参与度指标
跳出率
41.37%
每次访问页数
1.43
平均访问时长
00:00:23
researchid.com的 10 大竞争对手
在 五月 2026 与 researchid.com 相似的前 10 名网站,按关键字流量、受众定位和市场重叠方面与 researchid.com 的关联性排名
Background:Canadian health funding currently prioritizes scaling up for evidence-based primary care innovations, but not all teams prepare for scaling up. We explored scalability assessment among primary care innovators in the province of Quebec to evaluate their preparedness for scaling up.Methods:We performed a cross-sectional survey from Feb. 18 to Mar. 18, 2019. Eligible participants were 33 innovation teams selected for the 2019 Quebec College of Family Physicians’ Symposium on Innovations. We conducted a Web-based survey in 2 sections: innovation characteristics and the Innovation Scalability Self-administered Questionnaire. The latter includes 16 criteria (scalability components) grouped into 5 dimensions: theory (1 criterion), impact (6 criteria), coverage (4 criteria), setting (3 criteria) and cost (2 criteria). We classified innovation types using the International Classification of Health Interventions. We performed a descriptive analysis using frequency counts and percentages.Results:Out of 33 teams, 24 participated (72.7%), with 1 innovation each. The types of innovation were management (15/24), prevention (8/24) and therapeutic (1/24). Most management innovations focused on patient navigation (9/15). In order of frequency, teams had assessed theory (79.2%) and impact (79.2%) criteria, followed by cost (77.1%), setting (59.7%) and coverage (54.2%). Most innovations (16/24) had assessed 10 criteria or more, including 10 management innovations, 5 prevention innovations and 1 therapeutic innovation. Implementation fidelity was the least assessed criterion (6/24).Interpretation:The scalability assessments of a primary care innovation varied according to its type. Management innovations, which were the most prevalent and assessed the most scalability components, appear to be most prepared for primary care scale-up in Canada.
- 公司
- - -
- 行业
- - -
跳出率
57.08%
每次访问页数
1.24
平均访问时长
00:00:07
相似度评分
100%- 公司
- - -
- 行业
- - -
全球排名
- -
国家/地区排名
- -
品类排名
- -
跳出率
- -
每次访问页数
- -
平均访问时长
- -
Open access medical research journals. Pulsus Group, the medical peer-review publisher, publishes the work of medical researchers in a manner
跳出率
38.93%
每次访问页数
1.60
平均访问时长
00:00:17
相似度评分
73%- 公司
- - -
- 行业
- - -
全球排名
- -
国家/地区排名
- -
品类排名
- -
跳出率
- -
每次访问页数
- -
平均访问时长
- -
- 公司
- - -
- 行业
- - -
全球排名
- -
国家/地区排名
- -
品类排名
- -
跳出率
- -
每次访问页数
- -
平均访问时长
- -
- 公司
- - -
- 行业
- - -
全球排名
- -
国家/地区排名
- -
品类排名
- -
跳出率
- -
每次访问页数
- -
平均访问时长
- -
researchid.com在 五月 2026 的前五名竞争对手是:cmajopen.ca、hksid.org、idpublications.com、pulsus.com等。
根据 Similarweb 的月访问量数据,researchid.com 在 五月 2026 的头号竞争对手是 cmajopen.ca。与 researchid.com 相似度排名第二的网站是 hksid.org,排名第三的是 idpublications.com。
在 五月 2026,pulsus.com 被评为与 researchid.com 相似度第四高的网站,infectiousdiseases.utoronto.ca 位居第五。
进入前十名榜单的其他五家竞争对手分别是 infectdis.com、infectiousdiseaseconsultants.org、、 和 。
