六月 2026
stevelosh.com
显示 Similarweb 估计数据。
关联 GA4,公开验证您的网站指标
与您的成功同步
绑定 Google Analytics,验证您网站的流量及用户参与度指标
跳出率
43.52%
每次访问页数
1.77
平均访问时长
00:00:34
- 公司
- - -
- 行业
- - -
stevelosh.com的 10 大竞争对手
在 六月 2026 与 stevelosh.com 相似的前 10 名网站,按关键字流量、受众定位和市场重叠方面与 stevelosh.com 的关联性排名
common lisp
- 公司
- - -
- 行业
- - -
跳出率
41.51%
每次访问页数
2.27
平均访问时长
00:00:20
相似度评分
100%- 公司
- - -
- 行业
- - -
跳出率
41.51%
每次访问页数
2.84
平均访问时长
00:00:15
Recently I learned of the first-ever State of Emacs survey and I wanted to share a few thought about it with my readers. Okay, the survey is officially named just “Emacs Survey”, but it clearly draws a lot of inspiration from the numerous “State of Technology X” surveys that have become popular in recent years. That’s why I took the liberty to re-frame it in a way that will probably be familiar to more people. The “State of Something” surveys are typically ran by the teams maintaining some project to assess the health of its ecosystem, the needs of their users, the problems that need to be solved, the tools that people are using and so on. A good example would be the State of Clojure, that I participate in every year. There are similar surveys for many programming languages and even for some tools - e.g. I ran in the past a State of CIDER survey.1 Ideally, the data collected from the surveys drives the future development to some extent, and results in a better experience for everyone involved. I can speak from experience that the “State of Clojure” and “State of CIDER” surveys definitely influenced the direction of the projects. The “State of Emacs” survey is a somewhat different, though. One thing that bothers me a bit about the Emacs survey is that its site doesn’t list any clear purpose/goals for the survey. That definitely seems pretty weird to me. I saw the survey discussed on the Emacs mailing list and on Reddit, but sticking a paragraph of rationale on the survey site would have certainly helped. The survey is also not official in the sense, that it’s not initiated by Emacs’s development team, and judging by the hostility the topic generated on the emacs-devel mailing list it’s not like they were particularly excited about it.2 It was funny that most of the comments were complaints about things like the use of non-free JavaScript in the survey form and topics like that, instead of some constructive conversation about the format of the survey. I was especially
- 公司
- - -
- 行业
- - -
跳出率
40.41%
每次访问页数
1.54
平均访问时长
00:00:17
- 公司
- - -
- 行业
- - -
全球排名
- -
国家/地区排名
- -
品类排名
- -
跳出率
100%
每次访问页数
1.00
平均访问时长
00:00:12
Frequently asked questions.
- 公司
- - -
- 行业
- - -
跳出率
38.71%
每次访问页数
3.47
平均访问时长
00:00:44
- 公司
- - -
- 行业
- - -
跳出率
39.41%
每次访问页数
1.30
平均访问时长
00:00:01
Matt Dyson's personal website
- 公司
- - -
- 行业
- - -
跳出率
41.3%
每次访问页数
1.81
平均访问时长
00:00:09
a personal portfolio
- 公司
- - -
- 行业
- - -
跳出率
48.51%
每次访问页数
2.57
平均访问时长
00:00:28
stevelosh.com在 六月 2026 的前五名竞争对手是:lisp-lang.org、mercurial-scm.org、emacsredux.com、xahlee.info等。
根据 Similarweb 的月访问量数据,stevelosh.com 在 六月 2026 的头号竞争对手是 lisp-lang.org。与 stevelosh.com 相似度排名第二的网站是 mercurial-scm.org,排名第三的是 emacsredux.com。
在 六月 2026,xahlee.info 被评为与 stevelosh.com 相似度第四高的网站,book.mercurial-scm.org 位居第五。
进入前十名榜单的其他五家竞争对手分别是 oblotzky.industries、lispcookbook.github.io、mattdyson.org、codyhoover.com 和 jthatch.com。
