Now livetag icon
AI created more apps than ever, but 75% won't make it. Find out how to win. Download the reportbanner icon

scienceopen.com

Register to download PDF

scienceopen.com AI Traffic for May 2026

Abstract Background Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and the resulting coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) have afflicted tens of millions of people in a worldwide pandemic. Safe and effective vaccines are needed urgently. Methods In an ongoing multinational, placebo-controlled, observer-blinded, pivotal efficacy trial, we randomly assigned persons 16 years of age or older in a 1:1 ratio to receive two doses, 21 days apart, of either placebo or the BNT162b2 vaccine candidate (30 μg per dose). BNT162b2 is a lipid nanoparticle–formulated, nucleoside-modified RNA vaccine that encodes a prefusion stabilized, membrane-anchored SARS-CoV-2 full-length spike protein. The primary end points were efficacy of the vaccine against laboratory-confirmed Covid-19 and safety. Results A total of 43,548 participants underwent randomization, of whom 43,448 received injections: 21,720 with BNT162b2 and 21,728 with placebo. There were 8 cases of Covid-19 with onset at least 7 days after the second dose among participants assigned to receive BNT162b2 and 162 cases among those assigned to placebo; BNT162b2 was 95% effective in preventing Covid-19 (95% credible interval, 90.3 to 97.6). Similar vaccine efficacy (generally 90 to 100%) was observed across subgroups defined by age, sex, race, ethnicity, baseline body-mass index, and the presence of coexisting conditions. Among 10 cases of severe Covid-19 with onset after the first dose, 9 occurred in placebo recipients and 1 in a BNT162b2 recipient. The safety profile of BNT162b2 was characterized by short-term, mild-to-moderate pain at the injection site, fatigue, and headache. The incidence of serious adverse events was low and was similar in the vaccine and placebo groups. Conclusions A two-dose regimen of BNT162b2 conferred 95% protection against Covid-19 in persons 16 years of age or older. Safety over a median of 2 mont
Industry: N/A
Company--
Year Founded--
Employees--
Annual Revenue--
scienceopen.com
scienceopen.com

Traffic from AI engines to scienceopen.com Over Time

scienceopen.com's AI traffic from chatgpt.com has increased by 6.6% MoM, and its AI traffic from gemini.google.com has increased by 23.24%. See AI traffic stats for scienceopen.com in the past 3 months below.

Traffic Distibution Over Time

Top 3 AI Traffic Chatbots

chatgpt.com
chatgpt.com
46.72%
gemini.google.com
gemini.google.com
33.79%
claude.ai
claude.ai
3.26%
Show more months

scienceopen.com AI Traffic Split Over Time

The total AI traffic to scienceopen.com in May 2026 was 2.2K. The top AI engine driving traffic to scienceopen.com was chatgpt.com, accounting for 63.37% of AI visits last month. Drill down into each engine’s traffic share below.

Traffic Split Over Time

Traffic Split

The total amount of traffic sent from AI platforms to the selected competitive set.

2.2K

Start free trial

Prompts sending AI traffic to scienceopen.com

Explore the top prompts for scienceopen.com in May 2026

Prompts
May 2026 vs. May 2025
Export Excel
PromptMention typeTopicsCitations












Track Top prompts on scienceopen.com month over month

See which categories are growing based on sales, revenue, and views.
Try it for free