qmenta.com 的前十大競爭對手

terarecon.com

Realize immediate value with subscription-based Advanced Visualization & Artificial Intelligence across your entire organization

martinos.org

Revolutionizing imaging for the advancement of science and medicine

frontiersin.org

Explore open access research in comparative governance, comparing political systems, institutions and public administration.

brain.harvard.edu

Byung Hun studies how how neurons communicate and visualizes their activities in the brain.

ismrm.org

2026-27 Committee List Coming Soon! Executive Committee Executive Committee Members Only Mark A. Griswold, Ph.D., President Margaret A. Hall-Craggs, M.D., Past President Petra S. Hüppi, M.D., Vice President Nicole

cshl.edu

CSHL's faculty, which includes 8 Nobel Prize winners, continues to be strengthened by the 52 faculty members who head cutting-edge laboratories in a broad range of fields, some of which are often and increasingly interdisciplinary.

ajnr.org

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: ASPECTS quantifies early ischemic changes in anterior circulation stroke on NCCT but has interrater variability. We examined the agreement of conventional and automated ASPECTS and studied the value of computer-aided detection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively collected imaging data from consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke with large-vessel occlusion undergoing thrombectomy. Five raters scored conventional ASPECTS on baseline NCCTs, which were also processed by RAPID software. Conventional and automated ASPECTS were compared with a consensus criterion standard. We determined the agreement over the full ASPECTS range as well as dichotomized, reflecting thrombectomy eligibility according to the guidelines (ASPECTS 0–5 versus 6–10). Raters subsequently scored ASPECTS on the same NCCTs with assistance of the automated ASPECTS outputs, and agreement was obtained. RESULTS: For the total of 175 cases, agreement among raters individually and the criterion standard varied from fair to good (weighted κ = between 0.38 and 0.76) and was moderate (weighted κ = 0.59) for the automated ASPECTS. The agreement of all raters individually versus the criterion standard improved with software assistance, as did the interrater agreement (overall Fleiss κ = 0.15–0.23; P < .001 and .39 to .55; P = .01 for the dichotomized ASPECTS). CONCLUSIONS: Automated ASPECTS had agreement with the criterion standard similar to that of conventional ASPECTS. However, including automated ASPECTS during the evaluation of NCCT in acute stroke improved the agreement with the criterion standard and improved interrater agreement, which could, therefore, result in more uniform scoring in clinical practice. CAD : computer-aided detection and diagnosis

asnr.org

ASNR Insights: A Newsletter for Medical Students and Residents This new newsletter is designed specifically for ASNR medical student and resident members! ASNR Insights focuses on the unique challenges and opportunities that occur during this stage of your training. Fall/Winter 2025: Focus on Career Development

cancerresearchuk.org

We exist to beat cancer. And we're dedicated to saving and improving lives with our research. Will you help us transform the lives of future generations?