Juni 2026
Erstellen Sie ein Konto, um Similarweb weiterhin zu nutzen
Lassen sie sich Website-Metriken, Keywords, Top-Marketing-Kanäle, Marktforschungs-Tools und mehr anzeigen.
Erstellen Sie Ihr kostenloses Kontoabout.jstor.org
Globaler Rang
- -
Länderranking
- -
Kategorischer Rang
- -
Geschätzte Daten von Similarweb anzeigen.
Überprüfen Sie die Metriken Ihrer Website öffentlich, indem Sie Ihr GA4 verbinden
Reflektieren Sie Ihren Erfolg
Überprüfen Sie die Traffic- und Engagement-Metriken Ihrer Website durch Verbinden mit Google Analytics
Absprungrate
66.97%
Verweildauer
1.52
Durchschnittliche Besuchsdauer
00:00:22
- Unternehmen
- - -
- Branche
- - -
Top 10 about.jstor.org Wettbewerber
Die Top-10-Websites wie about.jstor.org in Juni 2026 sind in absteigender Reihenfolge nach ihrer Affinität zu about.jstor.org in Bezug auf den jeweiligen Schlüsselwörter-Traffic, das Zielgruppen-Targeting und entsprechende Marktüberschneidungen aufgeführt
- Unternehmen
- - -
- Branche
- - -
Globaler Rang
#142,718
18,087Absprungrate
48.97%
Verweildauer
2.05
Durchschnittliche Besuchsdauer
00:00:37
Similarity-Score
100%Abstract Background Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and the resulting coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) have afflicted tens of millions of people in a worldwide pandemic. Safe and effective vaccines are needed urgently. Methods In an ongoing multinational, placebo-controlled, observer-blinded, pivotal efficacy trial, we randomly assigned persons 16 years of age or older in a 1:1 ratio to receive two doses, 21 days apart, of either placebo or the BNT162b2 vaccine candidate (30 μg per dose). BNT162b2 is a lipid nanoparticle–formulated, nucleoside-modified RNA vaccine that encodes a prefusion stabilized, membrane-anchored SARS-CoV-2 full-length spike protein. The primary end points were efficacy of the vaccine against laboratory-confirmed Covid-19 and safety. Results A total of 43,548 participants underwent randomization, of whom 43,448 received injections: 21,720 with BNT162b2 and 21,728 with placebo. There were 8 cases of Covid-19 with onset at least 7 days after the second dose among participants assigned to receive BNT162b2 and 162 cases among those assigned to placebo; BNT162b2 was 95% effective in preventing Covid-19 (95% credible interval, 90.3 to 97.6). Similar vaccine efficacy (generally 90 to 100%) was observed across subgroups defined by age, sex, race, ethnicity, baseline body-mass index, and the presence of coexisting conditions. Among 10 cases of severe Covid-19 with onset after the first dose, 9 occurred in placebo recipients and 1 in a BNT162b2 recipient. The safety profile of BNT162b2 was characterized by short-term, mild-to-moderate pain at the injection site, fatigue, and headache. The incidence of serious adverse events was low and was similar in the vaccine and placebo groups. Conclusions A two-dose regimen of BNT162b2 conferred 95% protection against Covid-19 in persons 16 years of age or older. Safety over a median of 2 mont
- Unternehmen
- - -
- Branche
- - -
Globaler Rang
#89,900
7,166Absprungrate
30.02%
Verweildauer
4.12
Durchschnittliche Besuchsdauer
00:01:24
Similarity-Score
98%Access 160+ million publication pages and connect with 25+ million researchers. Join for free and gain visibility by uploading your research.
Globaler Rang
#368
48Absprungrate
33.62%
Verweildauer
4.32
Durchschnittliche Besuchsdauer
00:03:35
Similarity-Score
92%A system of non-tradable credits that flow between individuals like karma, hence proposed under that name, is a mechanism for repeated resource allocation that comes with attractive efficiency and fairness properties, in theory. In this study, we test karma in an online experiment in which human subjects repeatedly compete for a resource with time-varying and stochastic individual preferences or urgency to acquire the resource. We confirm that karma has significant and sustained welfare benefits even in a population with no prior training. We identify mechanism usage in contexts with sporadic high urgency, more so than with frequent moderate urgency, and implemented as a simple (binary) karma bidding scheme as particularly effective for welfare improvements: relatively larger aggregate efficiency gains are realized that are (almost) Pareto superior. These findings provide guidance for further testing and for future implementation plans of such mechanisms in the real world.
- Unternehmen
- - -
- Branche
- - -
Globaler Rang
#2,099
78Absprungrate
39.31%
Verweildauer
3.15
Durchschnittliche Besuchsdauer
00:04:15
Similarity-Score
89%- Unternehmen
- - -
- Branche
- - -
Globaler Rang
#205,221
26,681Absprungrate
45.73%
Verweildauer
2.56
Durchschnittliche Besuchsdauer
00:01:27
Similarity-Score
87%- Unternehmen
- - -
- Branche
- - -
Globaler Rang
- -
Länderranking
- -
Kategorischer Rang
- -
Absprungrate
75.78%
Verweildauer
1.38
Durchschnittliche Besuchsdauer
00:00:50
Similarity-Score
85%Digital Repository of Scientific Institutes (RCIN) was established and is being developed mainly as an outcome of two projects acquired and jointly accomplished by a group of Polish scientific institutes.
Globaler Rang
#230,903
19,180Absprungrate
46.06%
Verweildauer
2.04
Durchschnittliche Besuchsdauer
00:01:05
Similarity-Score
81%Magyar Tudományos Művek Tára
- Unternehmen
- - -
- Branche
- - -
Globaler Rang
#166,476
7,157Absprungrate
35.8%
Verweildauer
3.88
Durchschnittliche Besuchsdauer
00:03:29
Similarity-Score
79%The digital Loeb Classical Library is an interconnected, fully searchable, perpetually growing, virtual library of all that is important in Greek and Latin literature.
- Unternehmen
- - -
- Branche
- - -
Globaler Rang
#116,292
12,892Absprungrate
35.24%
Verweildauer
6.19
Durchschnittliche Besuchsdauer
00:07:33
Similarity-Score
76%- Unternehmen
- - -
- Branche
- - -
Globaler Rang
- -
Länderranking
- -
Kategorischer Rang
- -
Absprungrate
59.24%
Verweildauer
1.90
Durchschnittliche Besuchsdauer
00:00:35
Similarity-Score
75%about.jstor.orgDie Top-5-Wettbewerber in Juni 2026 lauten: unpaywall.org, scienceopen.com, researchgate.net, arxiv.org und mehr.
Laut Similarweb-Daten zu monatlichen Besuchen ist unpaywall.org in Juni 2026 der Top-Wettbewerber von about.jstor.org. Die zweitähnlichste Website ist scienceopen.com, gefolgt von researchgate.net auf Platz 3.
arxiv.org ist die viertähnlichste Website zu about.jstor.org, während doabooks.org in Juni 2026 den fünften Platz belegt.
Die weiteren fünf Wettbewerber in der Top-10-Liste sind eprints.whiterose.ac.uk, rcin.org.pl, mtmt.hu, loebclassics.com und dash.harvard.edu.