Juni 2026
Erstellen Sie ein Konto, um Similarweb weiterhin zu nutzen
Lassen sie sich Website-Metriken, Keywords, Top-Marketing-Kanäle, Marktforschungs-Tools und mehr anzeigen.
Erstellen Sie Ihr kostenloses Kontoaodr.org
Globaler Rang
#742,154
62,593Kategorischer Rang
#230
38Geschätzte Daten von Similarweb anzeigen.
Überprüfen Sie die Metriken Ihrer Website öffentlich, indem Sie Ihr GA4 verbinden
Reflektieren Sie Ihren Erfolg
Überprüfen Sie die Traffic- und Engagement-Metriken Ihrer Website durch Verbinden mit Google Analytics
Absprungrate
47.84%
Verweildauer
1.95
Durchschnittliche Besuchsdauer
00:00:25
- Unternehmen
- - -
- Branche
- - -
Top 10 aodr.org Wettbewerber
Die Top-10-Websites wie aodr.org in Juni 2026 sind in absteigender Reihenfolge nach ihrer Affinität zu aodr.org in Bezug auf den jeweiligen Schlüsselwörter-Traffic, das Zielgruppen-Targeting und entsprechende Marktüberschneidungen aufgeführt
the international journal of design is a peer-reviewed, open-access journal devoted to publishing research papers in all fields of design, including industrial design, visual communication design, interface design, animation and game design, architectural design, urban design, and other design related fields. it aims to provide an international forum for the exchange of ideas and findings from researchers across different cultures and encourages research on the impact of cultural factors on design theory and practice. it also seeks to promote the transfer of knowledge between professionals in academia and industry by emphasizing research in which results are of interest or applicable to design practices.
- Unternehmen
- - -
- Branche
- - -
Globaler Rang
#869,823
101,358Absprungrate
39.01%
Verweildauer
1.82
Durchschnittliche Besuchsdauer
00:00:22
Similarity-Score
100%Creative Reaction Lab mobilizes Black + Latinx youth to redesign racial and health inequities through our award-winning design framework: Equity-Centered Community Design (ECCD). CRXLAB is building an intergenerational movement of Redesigners for Justice™.
- Unternehmen
- - -
- Branche
- - -
Globaler Rang
#7,313,019
1,146,821Kategorischer Rang
- -
Absprungrate
48.52%
Verweildauer
2.32
Durchschnittliche Besuchsdauer
00:00:52
Similarity-Score
85%- Unternehmen
- - -
- Branche
- - -
Globaler Rang
- -
Länderranking
- -
Kategorischer Rang
- -
Absprungrate
- -
Verweildauer
- -
Durchschnittliche Besuchsdauer
- -
Similarity-Score
71%Globaler Rang
#1,817,583
480,990Absprungrate
42.64%
Verweildauer
1.31
Durchschnittliche Besuchsdauer
00:00:07
Similarity-Score
65%an international journal in cancer research and oncology.
- Unternehmen
- - -
- Branche
- - -
Globaler Rang
#816,305
59,113Absprungrate
45.94%
Verweildauer
1.80
Durchschnittliche Besuchsdauer
00:00:55
Similarity-Score
61%IEEE announced that it has reached a three-year open access agreement with CRUE, a consortium of Spanish universities, to support authors in Spain who wish to publish open access.
- Unternehmen
- - -
- Branche
- - -
Globaler Rang
- -
Länderranking
- -
Kategorischer Rang
- -
Absprungrate
67.06%
Verweildauer
1.50
Durchschnittliche Besuchsdauer
00:00:58
Similarity-Score
59%- Unternehmen
- - -
- Branche
- - -
Globaler Rang
#1,746,885
109,015Absprungrate
38.84%
Verweildauer
1.86
Durchschnittliche Besuchsdauer
00:00:23
Similarity-Score
56%### Key Findings ### Key Implications ### Objective: To contribute to strengthening family planning and reproductive health (FP/RH) programs by identifying behavioral factors that influence FP/RH professionals’ knowledge management (KM) behaviors. ### Methods: We conducted an online survey, in-depth interviews, and cocreation workshops between July 2019 and June 2020 with a convenience sample of FP/RH professionals in Africa, Asia, and the United States to explore their KM behaviors. We used descriptive statistics to analyze the survey data and inductive thematic analysis for the interviews, and we synthesized participant inputs from selected cocreation activities. ### Results: The samples consisted of 273 survey respondents, 23 interviewees, and 69 cocreation workshop participants. There were no significant differences in how professionals seek and share information by gender, role, or geographic region, except related to language barriers among Francophone professionals. FP/RH professionals reported using both digital sources and their professional networks to seek and share information. Choice overload and cognitive overload (when people are presented with too much information and in a way that is hard to understand, respectively) act as barriers as they seek and use information. Too many information sources lead to frustration and inaction and best practices are often not contextualized or specific enough for application. Positive KM organizational cultures help facilitate effective information sharing, but reluctance to share information persists due to fear of losing comparative advantage. FP/RH professionals noted that such barriers result in duplication of effort and lack of advancement in FP/RH programs. ### Conclusion: To improve overall program impact, KM interventions in FP/RH and global health should reduce cognitive and choice overload, especially by curating and sharing practical, actionable information with essential details on context and h
- Unternehmen
- - -
- Branche
- - -
Globaler Rang
#848,950
159,894Absprungrate
45.4%
Verweildauer
1.55
Durchschnittliche Besuchsdauer
00:00:20
Similarity-Score
53%Revista de la Sociedad Latinoamericana de Nutrición.
- Unternehmen
- - -
- Branche
- - -
Globaler Rang
#703,425
67,979Absprungrate
50.23%
Verweildauer
1.79
Durchschnittliche Besuchsdauer
00:01:12
Similarity-Score
49%- Unternehmen
- - -
- Branche
- - -
Globaler Rang
#663,418
117,233Absprungrate
53.86%
Verweildauer
2.30
Durchschnittliche Besuchsdauer
00:04:03
Similarity-Score
47%aodr.orgDie Top-5-Wettbewerber in Juni 2026 lauten: ijdesign.org, equitabledesign.com, graphics.cs.uh.edu, rightbrain.co.kr und mehr.
Laut Similarweb-Daten zu monatlichen Besuchen ist ijdesign.org in Juni 2026 der Top-Wettbewerber von aodr.org. Die zweitähnlichste Website ist equitabledesign.com, gefolgt von graphics.cs.uh.edu auf Platz 3.
rightbrain.co.kr ist die viertähnlichste Website zu aodr.org, während jcancer.org in Juni 2026 den fünften Platz belegt.
Die weiteren fünf Wettbewerber in der Top-10-Liste sind open.ieee.org, e-jnc.org, ghspjournal.org, alanrevista.org und dictionaryofsydney.org.