juin 2026
Créez un compte pour continuer à utiliser Similarweb
Affichez les indicateurs du site Web, les mots-clés, les meilleurs canaux marketing, les outils d'étude de marché, et plus encore.
Create your free accountjmirpublications.com
Classement mondial
#1,104,507
73,039Les données estimées de Similarweb sont affichées.
Validez publiquement les mesures de votre site en connectant votre GA4
Reflétez votre succès
Vérifiez les mesures de trafic et d'engagement de votre site Web en vous connectant à Google Analytics.
Taux de rebond
41.3%
Pages par visite
1.77
Durée moyenne de la visite
00:00:24
- Entreprise
- - -
- Secteur d'activité
- - -
Les 10 concurrents jmirpublications.com les plus visités
Les 10 sites les plus performants comme jmirpublications.com en juin 2026 sont classés par leur affinité avec jmirpublications.com en termes de trafic de mots-clés, de ciblage d'audience et de chevauchement de marché
Journal of Medical Internet Research - International Scientific Journal for Medical Research, Information and Communication on the Internet
- Entreprise
- - -
- Secteur d'activité
- - -
Classement mondial
#62,885
4,623Taux de rebond
48.18%
Pages par visite
2.44
Durée moyenne de la visite
00:01:57
Score de similarité
100%JMIR Research Protocols
- Entreprise
- - -
- Secteur d'activité
- - -
Classement mondial
#407,750
38,802Taux de rebond
42.95%
Pages par visite
1.97
Durée moyenne de la visite
00:00:49
Score de similarité
89%promoting integrity in scholarly research and its publication
- Entreprise
- - -
- Secteur d'activité
- - -
Classement mondial
#324,760
41,758Taux de rebond
48.4%
Pages par visite
1.78
Durée moyenne de la visite
00:00:33
Score de similarité
76%Background Surgical manipulation in the sinonasal cavity may transiently increase airflow resistance in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), predisposing them to inspiratory collapse of the oropharynx and/or hypopharynx. We hypothesized that patients with OSA undergoing sinonasal surgery would have higher rates of unplanned postoperative admission and respiratory complications than patients without OSA. Methods In this retrospective cohort study, patients ≥18 years undergoing sinonasal surgery were compared to patients having oropharyngeal, laryngeal, otologic, rotator cuff, and inguinal hernia surgery between January 2013 and December 2020. Cohorts were defined by the presence or absence of a preoperative diagnosis of OSA. All outcome variables were measured based on unique patient encounters for surgery; the total number of surgeries for the overall patient population (n=17,373) was greater than the total number of patients (n=11,951). Results Study groups consisted of 4,575 sinonasal, 2,301 oropharyngeal, 1,231 laryngeal, 1,353 otologic, 434 rotator cuff, and 2,057 inguinal hernia surgical patients. Among patients undergoing sinonasal surgery, patients with OSA had more unplanned admissions than patients without OSA (risk ratio [RR] 3.12; 95% CI 2.07-4.70). In all surgery groups, postoperative supplemental oxygen therapy was required more often in patients with OSA. Patients with OSA had the greatest incidence of oxygen desaturation after oropharyngeal surgery (RR 1.95; 95% CI 1.34-2.85). Incidence of 30-day readmission did not differ between patients with and without OSA in any surgical group. Conclusion In this study, patients with OSA undergoing sinonasal surgery had a greater risk of unplanned hospital admission than patients without OSA, and patients with OSA undergoing oropharyngeal surgery had a greater risk of postoperative desaturation than patients without OSA. Patients with OSA undergoing any surgery had a greater incidence of supplemental o
- Entreprise
- - -
- Secteur d'activité
- - -
Classement mondial
#1,293,942
194,447Taux de rebond
53.11%
Pages par visite
1.34
Durée moyenne de la visite
00:00:18
Score de similarité
72%- Entreprise
- SCImago Journal
- Secteur d'activité
- Éditeurs d'actualités et médias
Classement mondial
#15,039
265Taux de rebond
40.83%
Pages par visite
5.00
Durée moyenne de la visite
00:03:22
Score de similarité
68%Abstract Background Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and the resulting coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) have afflicted tens of millions of people in a worldwide pandemic. Safe and effective vaccines are needed urgently. Methods In an ongoing multinational, placebo-controlled, observer-blinded, pivotal efficacy trial, we randomly assigned persons 16 years of age or older in a 1:1 ratio to receive two doses, 21 days apart, of either placebo or the BNT162b2 vaccine candidate (30 μg per dose). BNT162b2 is a lipid nanoparticle–formulated, nucleoside-modified RNA vaccine that encodes a prefusion stabilized, membrane-anchored SARS-CoV-2 full-length spike protein. The primary end points were efficacy of the vaccine against laboratory-confirmed Covid-19 and safety. Results A total of 43,548 participants underwent randomization, of whom 43,448 received injections: 21,720 with BNT162b2 and 21,728 with placebo. There were 8 cases of Covid-19 with onset at least 7 days after the second dose among participants assigned to receive BNT162b2 and 162 cases among those assigned to placebo; BNT162b2 was 95% effective in preventing Covid-19 (95% credible interval, 90.3 to 97.6). Similar vaccine efficacy (generally 90 to 100%) was observed across subgroups defined by age, sex, race, ethnicity, baseline body-mass index, and the presence of coexisting conditions. Among 10 cases of severe Covid-19 with onset after the first dose, 9 occurred in placebo recipients and 1 in a BNT162b2 recipient. The safety profile of BNT162b2 was characterized by short-term, mild-to-moderate pain at the injection site, fatigue, and headache. The incidence of serious adverse events was low and was similar in the vaccine and placebo groups. Conclusions A two-dose regimen of BNT162b2 conferred 95% protection against Covid-19 in persons 16 years of age or older. Safety over a median of 2 mont
- Entreprise
- - -
- Secteur d'activité
- - -
Classement mondial
#89,900
7,166Taux de rebond
30.02%
Pages par visite
4.12
Durée moyenne de la visite
00:01:24
Score de similarité
66%we are a global publisher dedicated to providing the best possible service to the whole research community. we help authors to share their discoveries; enable researchers to find, access and understand the work of others and support librarians and institutions with innovations in technology and data.
- Entreprise
- Springer Nature
- Secteur d'activité
- Science et enseignement > Biologie
Classement mondial
#6,717
55Taux de rebond
38.75%
Pages par visite
3.66
Durée moyenne de la visite
00:03:31
Score de similarité
63%- Entreprise
- - -
- Secteur d'activité
- - -
Classement mondial
#1,011,724
156,817Classement national
#70,458
28,065Taux de rebond
40.84%
Pages par visite
1.57
Durée moyenne de la visite
00:00:13
Score de similarité
61%IJCSMC is a Double-Blind Peer Reviewed Fully Refereed Computer Science Journal | Yes, IJCSMC is legit and IJCSMC is trusted by millions of researchers worldwide
- Entreprise
- International Journal of Computer Sci...
- Secteur d'activité
- Science et enseignement > Science et éducation - Autres
Classement mondial
#837,526
208,142Taux de rebond
35.02%
Pages par visite
3.04
Durée moyenne de la visite
00:00:57
Score de similarité
58%Philip Holden conceptualises intellectual history in Singapore through the writings of Singaporean statesman S. Rajaratnam.
- Entreprise
- - -
- Secteur d'activité
- - -
Classement mondial
#953,714
36,854Taux de rebond
55.24%
Pages par visite
1.32
Durée moyenne de la visite
00:00:07
Score de similarité
56%jmirpublications.com : ses 5 plus grands concurrents en juin 2026 sont :jmir.org,researchprotocols.org,publicationethics.org, ochsnerjournal.org, etc.
D'après les données Similarweb relatives aux visites mensuelles, le principal concurrent de jmirpublications.com en juin 2026 est jmir.org. Le deuxième site le plus similaire à jmirpublications.com est researchprotocols.org, tandis que publicationethics.org complète le podium.
ochsnerjournal.org se classe au quatrième rang des sites les plus similaires à jmirpublications.com et scimagojr.com occupe la cinquième place en juin 2026.
Les cinq autres concurrents du top 10 sont scienceopen.com, springernature.com, ijern.com, ijcsmc.com et academia.sg.