10 principais dnh.com.my concorrentes

skrine.com

Skrine is one of the largest law firms in Malaysia providing a comprehensive range of legal services to a large cross-section of the business community in Malaysia as well as abroad.

thomasphilip.com.my

The largest dispute resolution only firm in Malaysia.

hhq.com.my

Protecting and commercialising brands, innovations, and creative assets through strategic intellectual property advisory, enforcement, licensing, and technology-driven IP solutions.

azmilaw.com

Trusted & dependable law firm specialised in corporate, arbitration & covering almost all areas of the law. Consult Azmi & Associates now!

christopherleeong.com

Discover Christopher & Lee Ong's banking & finance legal services. We offers expert advice on regulatory compliance, financing transactions, & risk management.

lh-ag.com

Lee Hishammuddin Allen & Gledhill is pleased to announce that Partners, Andrew Chiew and Crystal Wong have been invited to speak the 6th Annual International Arbitration, Corporate Fraud & Anti-Trust Summit. The prestigious event brings together local and international experts to share about Arbitration Law, Corporate Frauds & Digital Crimes and Competition Law.

lpplaw.my

We are a boutique corporate and commercial law firm in Kuala Lumpur, run by young entrepreneurial lawyers. We run this law firm more like a business and less like a traditional law firm. After all, we are an SME, too, and we want you to succeed so that we can succeed.

yhalaw.com.my

In Songa Product and Chemical Tankers III AS v Kairos Shipping II LLC [2026] 1 Lloyd's Rep 100, the Court of Appeal held that a clause allowing owners to repossess a vessel at a location “convenient to them” does not entitle them to demand redelivery at any distant port of their choosing. The Court emphasised that repossession must occur as soon as reasonably practicable, and where the vessel is already at a safe and accessible port, owners cannot require charterers to incur the cost and risk of sailing it across the world. The decision clarifies that charterers, as gratuitous bailees post-termination, are only obliged to preserve the vessel - not to undertake burdensome repositioning for the owners’ convenience.