10 principais iai.it concorrentes

ispionline.it

ISPI è l'unico istituto italiano che si occupa di analisi geopolitica e geoeconomica a livello internazionale con attività di ricerca e pubblicazioni.

carnegie.ru

Цель совместного проекта Московского Центра Карнеги и Экспертной сети ЕС-Россия (EUREN) — способствовать развитию диалога между Россией и странами ЕС. Основная задача нового проекта — создать в России платформу для профессиональной дискуссии об отношениях между Россией и ЕС. Экспертная сеть ЕС-Россия (EUREN) была инициирована в 2016 году Представительством ЕС в России и Российским советом по международным делам в качестве новой платформы для взаимодействия экспертов и аналитических центров ЕС и России по внешнеполитическим вопросам. EUREN — часть проекта «Общественная дипломатия. ЕС и Россия», который финансируется Европейским союзом и представляет собой платформу для диалога между российскими и европейскими аудиториями по широкому кругу двусторонних и глобальных вопросов. Проект реализуется в партнерстве с Представительством ЕС в России.

sipri.org

SIPRI works on timely, global issues which are often reported on in the media. In particular, our four data launches—arms industry, arms transfers, military expenditure and nuclear weapons—receive a lot of coverage. For these, and other topics, SIPRI researchers are available for interviews and quotes. SIPRI also produces press releases for major stories relating to its research throughout the year. To stay up-to-date with the lastest news from SIPRI, please sign up for our monthly newsletter.

realinstitutoelcano.org

La "mayoría mundial" rusa como alianza para desafiar los principios de Occidente y reconfigurar el orden internacional.

globalaffairs.org

Effective Date: March 1, 2018

arabcenterdc.org

In May 2025, Syria’s transitional President, Ahmed al-Sharaa, confirmed that his government was in indirect communication with Israel, the first time the two sides had talked since 2010, before the start of the Syrian uprising in 2011. The new round of contact apparently was aimed at securing Israeli withdrawal from Syrian territory and from the demilitarized buffer zone between the […]

eurispes.eu

Il lavoro dell'Eurispes ha contribuito all'emersione di numerosi fenomeni sociali realizzando una vera e propria opera di “scouting sociale”.

cepa.org

The inaugural 2024 CEPA Forum Leadership Awards Dinner, taking place on Thursday, September 26, 2024, is Washington DC’s premier event.

russiancouncil.ru

To any ordinary American citizen, it’s well known that government spending is spiraling out of control. The U.S. budget deficit now exceeds $23 trillion — with $1.109 trillion being added to the deficit in the fiscal year of 2019, and another $1.103 trillion projected to be added in 2020. Recently, on December 20th of last year, President Donald Trump signed into existence the huge 2,300-page general bill that includes two spending packages that approximate to $1.4 trillion. The bill received mostly bipartisan support and was lauded as a compromise on both sides. The American government should continue to stand strong with its allies and be an advocate of human rights, but they need to reevaluate the ways in which they do that. The U.S. needs to look at and approach international issues from a cost-benefit perspective. It’s time for a change in the establishment. There are valid questions to be asked about how, where, and why foreign aid is appropriated. These are questions of accountability. The status quo in the American government has gone on long enough, unimpeded, serving foreign interests with little benefit to the American public. The U.S. involvement in Ukraine and Afghanistan are just two instances at different scales that demonstrate this reality seen around the world. President Trump needs to critically assess foreign aid distribution, orient and repurpose the aid to specific points of interest that directly help the U.S.; imagine how much could be accomplished with respect to healthcare, education, and infrastructure if the U.S. started investing in itself more. Moreover, the U.S. would be better equipped to address more pertinent national security problems such as securing the border. President Trump would be addressing policy issues for the left, right, and everybody in between by confronting topics that are owned by his political opponents running for the Democratic nomination. If Trump wants to help solidify his chances at reelection, he should ta