whi.org的 10 大竞争对手

swhr.org

The 2023-2024 SWHR Federal Legislative Agenda, which complements SWHR’s Women’s Health Policy Agendas, outlines how SWHR is engaging in federal policy over 2023-2024

orwh.od.nih.gov

Science has brought unimagined progress, but there's still so much to learn. Explore the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Women's Health Research in Review to learn more about our unique, incredible bodies, and the research needed to take us forward. https://1.usa.gov/1o7zFuC

dc-whi.org

Washington Health Institute (WHI) provides exceptional Adult Primary Care, Infectious Diseases Specialty Care, Women's Health and Mental Health Services.

phmc.org

Join local nonprofit ECHO Systems on April 14 from 10 a.m. to 12 p.m. at the PHMC Public Health Space at 4601 Market Street to learn about ways businesses

solaresearch.org

A LASI Local is a local/regional event based on the Society for Learning Analytics Research’s event which is held in North America every June.

toplifeproject.com

Orgogliosamente supportati da

nutritionj.biomedcentral.com

Current guidelines recommend that "overweight" and "obese" individuals lose weight through engaging in lifestyle modification involving diet, exercise and other behavior change. This approach reliably induces short term weight loss, but the majority of individuals are unable to maintain weight loss over the long term and do not achieve the putative benefits of improved morbidity and mortality. Concern has arisen that this weight focus is not only ineffective at producing thinner, healthier bodies, but may also have unintended consequences, contributing to food and body preoccupation, repeated cycles of weight loss and regain, distraction from other personal health goals and wider health determinants, reduced self-esteem, eating disorders, other health decrement, and weight stigmatization and discrimination. This concern has drawn increased attention to the ethical implications of recommending treatment that may be ineffective or damaging. A growing trans-disciplinary movement called Health at Every Size (HAES) challenges the value of promoting weight loss and dieting behavior and argues for a shift in focus to weight-neutral outcomes. Randomized controlled clinical trials indicate that a HAES approach is associated with statistically and clinically relevant improvements in physiological measures (e.g., blood pressure, blood lipids), health behaviors (e.g., eating and activity habits, dietary quality), and psychosocial outcomes (such as self-esteem and body image), and that HAES achieves these health outcomes more successfully than weight loss treatment and without the contraindications associated with a weight focus. This paper evaluates the evidence and rationale that justifies shifting the health care paradigm from a conventional weight focus to HAES.

epic-norfolk.org.uk

the european prospective investigation of cancer, norfolk